
15:14
We should probably all pin Carolyn’s video

15:46
Yes, really helps!

01:09:44
There might be interesting objects of addition that are (at least causally) proprietary to the internet, so maybe gambling isn’t such a case, but perhaps addition to information might be closely (causally) associated to the internet in such a way that the title

01:09:45
"

01:10:10
“Internet addiction” is useful.

01:10:35
Forgive typos that first message was sent before I got a chance to edit.

01:11:45
I don’t know that people are addicted to information per se, but to the way that the information is delivered — and that’s proprietary to the internet

01:21:05
That is a nice way of putting it Becky. I like that.

01:25:28
I’ve wondered for a long time whether you could deliver completely meaningless nonsense in the exact same way and have the same addictive effects

01:28:17
I would doubt it; meaningfulness seems to be some sort of necessary prerec. for something to be addictive, at least in terms delivery of information. Is it information if meaningless?

01:28:19
question

01:30:25
@Ryan We can test it — at the Colorless Green Ideas News Network

01:31:28
Follow-up

01:34:13
Sadly I am not sure this work has helped me do less of that :(

01:34:40
noooo

01:35:11
Only after listening to Carolyn’s episode! :)

01:35:18
:)

01:36:35
Good clarification

01:41:51
Question

01:58:58
Your not part of the folk anymore :)

02:00:17
Unfortunately true

02:00:32
Follow up

02:00:59
Much better

02:02:57
Who’s doing the attending, then? :)